Why Museums Hold Human Remains
Why museums keep human remains in their care
| Reason | What museums actually do | Typical setting |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific & medical research | Study health, disease, diet and lifestyles of past populations. | Research stores, labs, teaching collections. |
| Archaeological & historical evidence | Use skeletal material as primary evidence for age, sex, activity and change over time. | Archaeology stores, reference collections. |
| Education & public understanding | Offer carefully framed displays and teaching sessions to explain the human past. | Galleries, classrooms, behind-the-scenes tours. |
| Cultural memory & identity | Work with communities to remember individuals, tell family or community stories and sometimes create memorials. | Shared projects, digital archives, commemorative spaces. |
| Legal custody & documentation | Hold remains as formal custodians while origins are researched, or until a decision on reburial or return is reached. | Secure stores, collections offices. |
Key points at a glance
- Human remains are kept for research, learning, documentation and sometimes as part of shared cultural memory.
- Most museums follow formal ethical guidelines that stress respect, consent and careful decision-making around display and research.
- In many institutions, only a small part of the human remains collection is on public view; most are stored in restricted areas for study.
- There is an active global conversation about where human remains should be, who decides, and when reburial or return is more appropriate than retention.
Have you ever stood in front of a skeleton in a glass case and wondered why it is there at all? For many visitors, human remains are the most striking, and sometimes the most unsettling, objects in a gallery. Museums hold them not as curiosities, but as sources of evidence about real people and real lives.
Modern museum practice aims to balance knowledge, care and respect for the dead. Professional guidelines from international bodies emphasise legality, collaboration with communities and the dignity of any human body kept in a collection.
What counts as human remains in museums
- Whole bodies and mummies
- Skeletons, individual bones and teeth
- Soft tissues, organs and preserved anatomical specimens
- Hair, nail and skin samples
- Casts, replicas and 3D models created from original remains
In museum practice, the phrase “human remains” covers much more than full skeletons in display cases. It can mean anything that was once part of a living person, from a single tooth to a preserved organ or a wrapped mummy. Many codes of ethics treat hair, soft tissue and microscopic samples with the same level of seriousness as an entire body.
Some museums also include digital scans and 3D-printed replicas in this discussion, because they are created directly from human remains and can reveal intimate details about an individual. Thinking clearly about what “counts” helps staff apply consistent rules of care, access and consent.
Scientific and historical reasons for holding human remains
- Bioarchaeology: studying bones to reconstruct health, activity and life conditions.
- Population history: examining long-term changes in height, disease and diet.
- Forensic techniques: developing methods that also support modern identifications.
- Chronology: using radiocarbon dating and other methods to anchor timelines.
For researchers, a collection of human remains functions a bit like a library where every bone is a page. By examining tiny details on a femur, tooth enamel or healed fracture, scientists can read evidence for nutrition, workload and disease that written records rarely capture.
Large curated collections allow patterns to emerge. When hundreds of skeletons from different centuries are studied together, museums can support research into changing life expectancy, the spread of infectious diseases and shifts in everyday work and movement across generations.
This kind of reasearch is tightly controlled. Many institutions require detailed project proposals, ethics approvals and, where possible, input from communities connected to the remains. The goal is to make sure every new study genuinely adds public benefit and treats the individuals in the collection with care and dignity.
Education, empathy and public displays
- Medical teaching for students and professionals.
- Public programmes that explain health, death and the body in clear language.
- Carefully framed exhibitions that focus on stories and context, not shock value.
Many museums keep human remains in order to teach. Students learning medicine or archaeology often train with real bones under strict supervision. For the wider public, well-designed displays can show how people in the past lived, fell ill, healed and grieved.
Current guidance encourages museums to keep displays purposeful rather than sensational. Exhibitions that explain why a body was preserved, how it was acquired and what the museum is doing now to work with communities tend to build empathy instead of simple curiosity.
Some institutions now choose to show fewer human remains and place more emphasis on digital reconstructions, replicas and personal stories. The physical remains may stay in the collection, but access is limited and the focus shifts to education, reflection and remembrance.
Respect, consent and ethical rules
- Respect for the person whose body is held.
- Compliance with law and with professional codes.
- Consultation with descendants or communities.
- Transparency about how decisions are made.
International museum organisations set out ethics codes that apply directly to human remains. These documents ask museums to make sure that every body or body part is treated with inherent dignity, that collections follow the law, and that communities are consulted whenever possible.
National guidance adds more detail. Documents produced by cultural agencies and professional associations describe how to store, study and, when appropriate, display human remains. They stress careful documentation, secure spaces, trained staff and clear procedures for requests about reburial or return.
In practice, this means that museums regularly review their policies, keep lists of who can access which remains, and record every research project in detail. Many institutions now publish summaries of their human remains policies online so that visitors and communities can see how decisions are taken and what standards of care apply.
Why some remains stay and others are returned
- Clear community connections may lead to requests for return or reburial.
- Unclear or mixed histories often require long research and dialogue.
- Shared decision-making can result in partial display, long-term custody or memorialisation.
Museums today face an important question: when is it right to keep human remains, and when should they return to a community or to the ground? Many collections grew during periods when consent was not properly recorded. As a result, staff now dedicate significant time to researching origins and talking with people who feel a connection to those individuals.
In some countries, guidance encourages museums to prioritise ancestral remains taken from specific groups, especially where relatives or community representatives are asking for return and reburial. In other cases, reports suggest reducing or ending the public display of certain remains and creating memorial spaces or shared research projects instead.
The result is that human remains in museums now follow many different paths. Some are reburied, some are returned to communities, some remain in restricted research collections, and some stay on display with new interpretation that highlights names, stories and relationships rather than anonymous bodies.
Care behind the scenes
- Secure storage with controlled temperature and humidity.
- Detailed records of origin, treatment and research.
- Limited access for trained staff and approved researchers.
- Regular policy review in light of new ethical discussions.
Most human remains in museums are never seen by visitors. They are kept in quiet, climate-controlled stores with shelves, archival boxes and padded trays. Conservation staff monitor temperature, humidity and pests to slow down natural decay and protect fragile bones and tissues.
Access to these spaces is usually restricted. Researchers must explain exactly what they plan to study, why the work matters and how they will handle the remains. Review panels, ethics committees and, where appropriate, community representatives help decide which projects go ahead so that benefits and risks are balanced.
Some museums have recently rewritten their human remains policies from the ground up. Changes can include limiting new acquisitions, tightening rules on photography, and placing more emphasis on researching individual identities. The trend is toward collections that are smaller, better documented and more focused on careful, ethical stewardship.
How visitors can respond thoughtfully
- Read the labels and notice how the display explains origin, consent and purpose.
- Pay attention to language that refers to people rather than “specimens”.
- Follow museum guidance on photography and sharing images online.
- Give yourself time to feel and think; it is normal to react strongly.
Standing in front of human remains can raise difficult questions. What would this person have wanted? How did their body arrive here? A good display invites visitors to think about care, consent and remembrance, not just about anatomy or preservation. Taking a moment to read, look closely and reflect shows respect for the individual.
If you are unsure about what you are seeing, museum staff can often explain why certain remains are still held, how decisions are made and what conversations are happening with communities. Asking thoughtful questions, following house rules and sharing feedback all contribute to more careful, transparent practice and help keep human dignity at the centre of museum work.
